Creatures and Cardinals
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Jónsson Cardinals, Erdös Cardinals, and The Core Model
We show that if there is no inner model with a Woodin cardinal and the Steel core model K exists, then every Jónsson cardinal is Ramsey in K, and every δ-Jónsson cardinal is δ-Erdős in K. In the absence of the Steel core model K we prove the same conclusion for any model L[E ] such that either V = L[E ] is the minimal model for a Woodin cardinal, or there is no inner model with a Woodin cardina...
متن کاملEconomic, Psychological, and Neural Creatures
" Perception and choice are the products of context dependent and comparative evaluation mechanisms that can be systematic and predictable, but that do not readily lend themselves to analyses that assume consistency, independence and invariance. "-Eldar Shafir Eldar Shafir's paper powerfully reinforces the notion that we are indeed different creatures from what much economics supposed. To cite ...
متن کاملUltrafilters and Large Cardinals
This paper is a survey of basic large cardinal notions, and applications of large cardinal ultrafilters in forcing. The main application presented is the consistent failure of the singular cardinals hypothesis. Other applications are mentioned that involve variants of Prikry forcing, over models of choice and models of determinacy. My talk at the Ultramath conference was about ultrafilters and ...
متن کاملCondensation and Large Cardinals
We introduce two generalized condensation principles: Local Club Condensation and Stationary Condensation. We show that while Strong Condensation (a generalized Condensation principle introduced by Hugh Woodin in [19]) is inconsistent with an ω1-Erdős cardinal, Stationary Condensation and Local Club Condensation (which should be thought of as weakenings of Strong Condensation) are both consiste...
متن کاملGenericity and Large Cardinals
A natural question to ask is whether this result has an analogue in the context of large cardinals. The purpose of this article is to provide the strongest such analogue not ruled out by limitations imposed by the existence of Woodin cardinals. To describe the latter limitations we consider the forcing P , described as follows. Let δ be inaccessible and consider the language L(δ): (a) n ∈ R bel...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
سال: 2019
ISSN: 1079-8986,1943-5894
DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2019.8